Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Ch 10 Sly and Doris complain that I have rejected them, which I don’t understand because I visit them with Primo and talk to them and clean their kitchen and garage and weed their garden. In what world is that rejection? And they complain that Stephanie and I are friends.

Primo,

I know that somehow Goldie and Stephanie correspond and have a relationship.  But I don’t understand why, because they have absolutely nothing in common unless it is gossip about our family.  Goldie, by so coldly rejecting me and your mother, made it clear that she doesn’t want to be part of our family.  Please let her know that you don’t want to hear any of the gossip she gets from Stephanie about our family.

Stephanie is our former daughter-in-law and the mother of our grandchildren, so we have to get along with her even when we disagree—sometimes strongly—with some of the things she does, especially with the children.  She ALWAYS had the children on the dole for free food at school, which here, anyway, includes breakfast.  The program, of course, is for children who live in poverty, which certainly does not describe their household.

The main reason we have been unable to penetrate the cocoon they live in has always been how closely Stephanie ties them to her apron strings.  Consequently, the children depend on her for everything.  They have never yet taken any kind of pill (medication)--another way for Stephanie to control them.

No one from Stephanie's  family—and apparently, none of her “girlfriends”—had gone to college before Michael and Maria, and Stephanie doesn’t know how to deal with that. Maria needs to have an opportunity to learn how to be independent; even Michael criticizes her for her lack of independence. Stephanie was aware that Maria's friend drove home every other weekend, so there was no need for Stephanie to go to visit her (the money is a factor to us, but not the only one).  As long as Stephanie has lived here, she has always driven fairly long distances very often, as if gas is free. Recall that she had already exceeded the mileage warranty on the Mazda van before the month was up, and the place where she bought it was initially not going to honor the warranty when she took it in for whatever problem it had.  

Doris: re Stephanie driving long distances: for frivolous reasons.  She often travels to (out of town) stores to select clothing items and other “bargains.” How she paid for Maria's Junior and Senior Prom gowns, I’ll never know. She also seems to have eaten at every restaurant in the area (except for the very highest priced ones).  From the outside, the kids have enjoyed all the luxuries associated with upper middle class to affluent families.

Remember that before the kids were working part time, she often paid for movie-going at $20ea. She is a true shop-aholic and appears to have no self-control about her buying mania.  

Maria had only been gone 5 weeks before Stephanie visited, which required a hotel and gas for 520 miles, plus the shoppin’ for other of Maria's needs/wants. She had also prepared food to put in Maria's freezer (meatballs, etc.).


6 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. I know. My SIL is the loveliest, most generous, nicest person in the world. She was so, so helpful to Sly and Doris, even when they were so nasty to her. And my niece is also lovely and has not suffered as a result of her mother's loving attention. (As in, she spent a year as an AmeriCorp volunteer and has just started a master's program. I think she is quite independent!)

      Delete
  2. I like how they're trying to make sure Primo doesn't get any side of any story but theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hold on...some things don't add up. Their household "certainly" does not meet the definition of poverty...but they don't know how Stephanie affords stuff? Also, the kids never had antibiotics or even Tylenol, and Stephanie made this choice to give herself MORE control? Normally, if you want to control people, getting them hooked on pills you supply is a great way to do it.

    I also like how Stephanie is profligate and smothering by visiting her baby girl after a mere five weeks at college.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should add, I don't for two milliseconds believe that Stephanie has never administered medication to her children. I'm just confused as to how *not* giving them drugs is controlling them.

      Delete
  4. To sum up: "Please don't listen to any of the gossip about our family that she may tell you. Instead listen to US gossip about HER. Here... let me demonstrate"

    (P.S. Pretty sure bringing your kids food *after a month* is just bonus points in the good parenting stakes)

    ReplyDelete